Retro remakes are an odd beast. What is considered a retro remake? What’s their purpose? Why take an old, outdated game, repaint it and then re-release it? Fan-service? A quick n cheap cash-in? As something for the interns to tinker with? All of the above?
Before we get too deep into that discussion, let’s focus on some of the different ways publishers/developers can remake/re-release a retro game for the current generation.
First off is the straight-up port. This is when a publisher takes an old game, packages it in some kind of emulator and releases it onto the new platform. In most cases, the game is an exact replica of its retro counterpart. Sometimes there will be some minor tweaks (altering a word or two of dialogue, changing a reference to a copyrighted work, etc) or features missing that may have required additional hardware. (eg. N64 rumblepack. Wii classic controller lacks rumble support) And then there are times when minor or major features will be added such as graphics post-processing to eliminate pixelation or online capability for multiplayer games. Unfortunately there can be problems when porting old games to new systems. One such problem lies in the hardware, sometimes newer hardware just can’t play or render old games the way their original systems intended. Another, more complex problem can be copyright; the copyright agreements for certain parts of the game, say a soundtrack, may have expired and the publisher can’t renew that agreement. The worst-case-scenario though for retro ports is the lack of original resources. Publishers get bought, developers go bankrupt; computers get replaced, hard-drives crash. The original system files and resources needed for a clean port just may not exist anymore. When this happens, publishers will sometimes go to the hacker/homebrew community, anonymously of course, and get the ROM from the many restoration or archival projects. Barring any of those problems, ports are the quick and easy re-releases that allow retro gamers to get their game on modern consoles without resorting to hacking and homebrew.
Next we have the whitewash retro re-releases. These are when classic games are given a total graphical and audio overhaul while leaving the core game mechanics fully intact. These games feel slightly more refreshed and don’t wear on your eyes with ancient, pixelated graphics, though they do lose some of that “retro” feel. Still, these are great ways to experience the classics, but in a new way.
The last way publishers can dish out some “classic” goodness is with the retro reboot. This is a remake or sequel to a retro game where just about every aspect of the game has been changed. The core concept or idea usually remains intact and the developers attempt to give it a “retro” feel but the graphics, sound and even gameplay have been significantly altered to make it a better fit with the new generation of gamers. These remakes often get mixed results from fans because in the process of revamping a classic to modern standards, what made the game great in the first place is sometimes lost. Though there have been some incredible successes in this class of remake such as New Super Mario Bros. but this is usually because the developers stick as close to the original formula as possible without creating a whitewash remake.
Whether for fan-service or quick cash-ins, retro remakes are great for anyone who missed the games that defined or created the genres and franchises we play today. Or they work if you’re just feeling nostalgic for your childhood:) Which is your favorite type of remake?
Latest posts by Joshua Caleb (see all)
- Rick Barbie: Detective “On the Case” - April 1, 2012
- The Many “Pre-Hero” Jobs of the Legend of Zelda’s Link - February 14, 2012
- Why Exactly is Zelda Legendary? - February 7, 2012